Singapore AI Governance Framework for Agents
The world's first governance framework built specifically for autonomous AI agents. Published by IMDA at the World Economic Forum in Davos. AgentApproved scores your agent against all 8 requirements across 4 governance dimensions.
What is the Singapore Model AI Governance Framework?
In January 2026, Singapore's Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) published the Model AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI (v1.0) — the first governance framework anywhere in the world designed specifically for AI agents that plan, reason, and act autonomously.
This builds on Singapore's track record of AI governance leadership. IMDA published the original Model AI Governance Framework in 2019, updated it for generative AI in 2024, and now addresses the unique challenges of agentic systems — agents that initiate tasks, select tools, update databases, and adapt dynamically across multi-step workflows.
The framework is voluntary, not legislation. This is a deliberate choice. Singapore favours principles-based, pro-innovation governance backed by government-built testing tools (like the open-source AI Verify toolkit) rather than mandatory compliance regimes with penalties. The AI Verify Foundation, IMDA's wholly-owned subsidiary, co-develops these frameworks with 180+ member organisations including AWS, Google, IBM, Microsoft, and Salesforce.
The 4 Governance Dimensions
The Agentic AI framework identifies five core risk categories for autonomous agents: unauthorised actions, erroneous actions, biased or unfair actions, data breaches, and system disruption. It addresses these through four governance dimensions:
1. Assess and Bound Risks Upfront
Evaluate each use case by likelihood and impact. Restrict tool access to whitelisted services. Apply least-privilege permissions. Use sandboxed environments for testing. Define SOP-driven workflows agents must follow. Consider autonomy level, access to sensitive systems, and action reversibility.
2. Make People Meaningfully Accountable
Clear responsibility allocation across the entire lifecycle — developers, deployers, operators, end users. Human-in-the-loop mechanisms for high-stakes or irreversible actions. Override, intercept, and review capabilities. Protection against automation bias in supervisory roles.
3. Implement Technical Controls
Three lifecycle phases: design (tool guardrails, plan reflections, least-privilege), pre-deployment (workflow-level testing, policy compliance), and deployment (staged rollouts, real-time monitoring, anomaly detection, failsafe mechanisms). Continuous monitoring of high-risk actions.
4. Enable End-User Responsibility
Training and transparency on agent permissions. Differentiated approaches for internal vs external users. Clear escalation channels. User education to prevent over-reliance. Users as active stewards, not passive consumers.
Why This Matters for AI Agents
The Agentic AI framework addresses risks that simply don't exist in traditional or generative AI:
- Cascading failures — one agent action triggers a chain of unintended consequences across systems
- Tool misuse — agents selecting wrong tools or using them beyond intended scope
- Accountability gaps — when an agent takes 15 autonomous steps, who is responsible for step 12?
- Privilege escalation — agents gaining more access than intended through multi-step reasoning
- Multi-step compounding errors — small mistakes compound across sequential autonomous decisions
Agent-specific requirements include agent identity and permissions systems (analogous to service accounts in IT), plan reflections where agents evaluate their own planned actions before execution, and workflow-level evaluations that test entire agent pipelines rather than just individual outputs.
How AgentApproved Maps to the Singapore MGF
AgentApproved's singapore-mgf scope maps your agent's runtime behaviour to all 8 requirements across the 4 dimensions. Each requirement is scored individually with an overall compliance grade.
Our SDK captures the evidence that proves compliance:
- Dimension 1 (Risk Bounding) — agent identity tracking, tool usage logging, permission scope evidence
- Dimension 2 (Accountability) — human oversight records, decision approval chains, reviewer attribution
- Dimension 3 (Technical Controls) — automated event logging, session lifecycle tracking, anomaly patterns, pre/post deployment testing evidence
- Dimension 4 (Transparency) — capability documentation, user-facing disclosure logging, escalation records
Every event is SHA-256 hash-chained and Ed25519 signed. The resulting attestation certificate is cryptographically verifiable — any party can independently confirm the compliance score without trusting AgentApproved.
Singapore MGF vs EU AI Act
| Aspect | Singapore MGF | EU AI Act |
|---|---|---|
| Legal status | Voluntary framework | Binding legislation |
| Penalties | None AI-specific | Up to 7% global turnover |
| Approach | Principles-based, pro-innovation | Risk classification (prohibited/high/limited/minimal) |
| Agentic AI | Dedicated framework (Jan 2026) | Not yet specifically addressed |
| Testing tools | Government-built AI Verify (open source) | Conformity assessments by notified bodies |
| Interoperability | Mapped to NIST AI RMF + ISO 42001 | Standalone |
The frameworks are complementary, not competing. An agent attested against both the EU AI Act and Singapore MGF through AgentApproved demonstrates global compliance readiness. Use scope full to get scored against all frameworks simultaneously.
Why Singapore Matters
Singapore is the AI governance capital of the Asia-Pacific region:
- S$1 billion government investment in AI R&D for 2025-2030
- $1.31 billion in private AI funding attracted in H1 2025 alone
- MAS financial AI guidelines — mandatory for all regulated financial institutions since December 2024
- ASEAN AI governance leadership — published regional guidance adopted by member states
- Bilateral agreements with the US, UK, and South Korea on AI governance standards
- AI Verify Foundation — 180+ members including every major cloud provider
For any AI agent operating in APAC markets — especially financial services regulated by MAS — Singapore MGF compliance is becoming a baseline expectation. And because the framework is mapped to both NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001, compliance in Singapore reduces the effort needed for international standards.
Get Started
pip install agentapproved
Install the SDK, create an API key on the dashboard, and request your first Singapore MGF attestation with scope singapore-mgf.